On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:22 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:19:42 -0600 > >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:57 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: >> > It therefore didn't get any -next exposure, so it's unreasonable to >> > merge this stuff now. >> >> Since when has sitting in a -next tree been a requirement for merging >> when the series has been kept up to date and tested? I purposefully >> kept it out of -next to ensure that when it was applied for real to a >> -next tree it would be as complete, bug free, and bisectable as >> possible since once it hits a signed-off -next branch the individual >> commit cannot be modified. > > I know your pissed off, but take a deep breath and consider this > from my position. > > If I don't put a line in the sand somewhere, everyone can say > "I've been working so hard, I posted it to the lists a thousand > times, I have tons of testers" and I have to put the change in. > > That doesn't work, so please wait until the next release to get > your changes in. And get them into a tree that gets exposure > in linux-next. Then you have nothing to worry about.
Dammit. Why did you have to go and sound so reasonable when I was all geared up for a pointless flame war. well... alright... but I reserve the right to be grumpy and surly for a few days. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
