From: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:19:42 -0600
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:57 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > > It therefore didn't get any -next exposure, so it's unreasonable to > > merge this stuff now. > > Since when has sitting in a -next tree been a requirement for merging > when the series has been kept up to date and tested? I purposefully > kept it out of -next to ensure that when it was applied for real to a > -next tree it would be as complete, bug free, and bisectable as > possible since once it hits a signed-off -next branch the individual > commit cannot be modified. I know your pissed off, but take a deep breath and consider this from my position. If I don't put a line in the sand somewhere, everyone can say "I've been working so hard, I posted it to the lists a thousand times, I have tons of testers" and I have to put the change in. That doesn't work, so please wait until the next release to get your changes in. And get them into a tree that gets exposure in linux-next. Then you have nothing to worry about. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
