On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:48:45 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <avoront...@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> But I see the point of confusion... Instead of teaching
> "SDHCI core" to work with 32 bits hosts, we'd better handle this
> in the eSDHC part, in the accessors.
>
> This is relatively trivial and should not cause much overhead
> (at least when using DMA), just a small state machine with
> the xfer mode register shadowed in software (plus, notice that
> this also handles BLOCK_SIZE, as I promised in another email):
>
Me like. Keeps my life a lot saner. :)
Just be aware that there is a remote risk of breakage as people hacking
on sdhci-core won't be aware of esdhc's, let's call it unique,
behaviour. Some testing now and then on your part would be prudent. :)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
