On Oct 15, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

* Kumar Gala | 2008-10-15 08:25:54 [-0500]:


On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:59 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2008-10-15 00:49:46 [+0200]:

is the -mabi=no-spe really needed?
It seems to work the other way around (without -mabi=no-spe but with -mabi=no-spe) alteast I did not find anything in do_syslog() or while
browsing through the dissasm. I do a boot check tomorrow.

Okay. I recompiled with -mspe=no and was able to boot without trouble.
It didn't work with -mabi=no-spe.

I'm confused.. what did you change from your patch?

This is the patch it right now:
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-altivec)

# No SPE instruction when building kernel
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-spe)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mspe=no)

# Enable unit-at-a-time mode when possible. It shrinks the
# kernel considerably.
--

With this patch it compiles and boots fine.
The option -mabi=no-spe is not required.

ok.  can post a clean patch w/just this change.

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to