* Kumar Gala | 2008-10-15 08:25:54 [-0500]: > > On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:59 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2008-10-15 00:49:46 [+0200]: >> >>>> is the -mabi=no-spe really needed? >>> It seems to work the other way around (without -mabi=no-spe but with >>> -mabi=no-spe) alteast I did not find anything in do_syslog() or while >>> browsing through the dissasm. I do a boot check tomorrow. >> >> Okay. I recompiled with -mspe=no and was able to boot without trouble. >> It didn't work with -mabi=no-spe. > > I'm confused.. what did you change from your patch?
This is the patch it right now: --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-altivec) # No SPE instruction when building kernel KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-spe) +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mspe=no) # Enable unit-at-a-time mode when possible. It shrinks the # kernel considerably. -- With this patch it compiles and boots fine. The option -mabi=no-spe is not required. > - k Sebastian _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
