On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:09:53PM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
+/* We support DMA to/from any memory page via the iommu */
+static int dma_iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+ struct iommu_table *tbl = dev->archdata.dma_data;
+
+ if (!tbl || tbl->it_offset > mask) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ "Warning: IOMMU offset too big for device mask\n");
+ if (tbl)
+ printk(KERN_INFO
+ "mask: 0x%08lx, table offset: 0x%08lx\n",
+ mask, tbl->it_offset);
+ else
+ printk(KERN_INFO "mask: 0x%08lx, table unavailable\n",
+ mask);
+ return 0;
+ } else
+ return 1;
+}
Small nitpick, but wouldn't a
if (tbl && tbl->it_offset <= mask)
return 1;
< the rest>
be much easier to read?
Seems cleaner to me..... but I want this patch, which is a move of the
iommu code, to be *just* a move. So I'm going to leave this as-is for
now.
Thanks!
-Becky
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev