> Yeah, the statement this time should be why do you keep _single :) > It don't really mind which one we keep, but having both and both > optional seems rather odd.
It would be more logic to implement _single on top of _page.. as long as we can still do sub-page mappings (needed on ppc64) which I think we can using the offset / size args of _page... But that means more work changing the existing ppc64 backends :-) So probably a worthwhile long term goal but what Becky did is ok for the transition. I can look at fixing up the ppc64 ones to implement page (and see if that causes any problem) some time after Plumbers conf. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
