On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 13:48 +0200, David Jander wrote: > On Wednesday 27 August 2008 23:04:39 Steven Munroe wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 08:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 15:06 +0200, David Jander wrote: > > > > Hi Matt,
[SNIP] > I am not complaining. I was only wondering if it is just me or there really > is > very little that has been done (for either uClibc, glibc, or whatever for > powerpc) to improve performance of (linux-) applications on "lower"-power > platforms (G2 core), AFAICS there is a LOT that can be gained by simple > tweaks. [SNIP] > > The problem is: I have very little experience with powerpc assembly and only > very limited time to dedicate to this and I am looking for others who have I improved the PowerPC memcpy and friends in uClibc a while ago. It does basically the same a the kernel memcpy but without any cache instructions. It is written in C, but in such a way that optimal assembly is generated. Jocke _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
