Hi all, > These could probably go to glibc > as new general purpose memxxx() routines. You will probably see > a big increase once dcbz is added to the copy/memset functions.
glibc memxxx for powerpc are horribly inefficient. For optimal performance, we should should dcbt instruction to establish the source address in cache, and dcbz to establish the destination address in cache. We should do dcbt and dcbz such that the touches happen a line ahead of the actual copy. The problem which is see is that dcbt and dcbz instructions don't work on non-cacheable memory (obviously!). But memxxx function are used for both cached and non-cached memory. Thus this optimized memcpy should be smart enough to figure out that both source and destination address fall in cacheable space, and only then used the optimized dcbt/dcbz instructions. You can expect to see a significant jump in memxxx function after using dcbt/dcbz. Thanks, Prodyut Hazarika _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
