On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 18:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > thanks. Will take a look. I just plan on overloading MMUCR with > MAS0. > > Erg. Why? Please don't do that. This is common code and MAS0 > doesn't > make much sense on 4xx. It'll be confusing to anyone that isn't aware > of this change.
Nah, he meant using the slot for MAS0 in the exception frame structure as to not have to define two different structures I suppose... > Can we come up with a generic #define that gets used instead? > > josh Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
