On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:04:08 -0500 Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Apr 30, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 03:02 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> got that. Does 40x/44x have anything similar we need to save/ > >> restore? > > > > MMUCR I'd say... look at what our tlbie does there... > > thanks. Will take a look. I just plan on overloading MMUCR with MAS0. Erg. Why? Please don't do that. This is common code and MAS0 doesn't make much sense on 4xx. It'll be confusing to anyone that isn't aware of this change. Can we come up with a generic #define that gets used instead? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
