On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 19:47 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:05:30 PST, Andrew Morton said: > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:27:54 +0100 Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > That's not an issue in my case. The SM50x can be connected to > > > either an PCI or some Local/CPU-whateverbus IF. > > > I.e. on the MPC85xx PowerPC, PCI and LocalBus are separate bussses. > > > If the sm501 is attached to the MPC85xx' PCI like any other video card, > > > the PCI config-space is can be accessed as usual, whereas the framebuffer > > > memory area is byte-swapped compared to other common video cards. > > > Anyway, my head is now officially spinning. Did anyone actually have a > > reason why we shouldn't proceed with Anton's patch? > > Clemens answered my question regarding the real-life existence of hardware > that would benefit. I'd say if Anton's patch works on Clemens' hardware and > otherwise passes review, we should proceed...
No objection here neither. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
