Andrew Morton writes:

> Bizarrely, the original author of the patch (Anton) has fallen off the cc. 
> Could whoever did that please thwap himself?
> 
> Anyway, my head is now officially spinning.  Did anyone actually have a
> reason why we shouldn't proceed with Anton's patch?

I was wondering if it would be sufficient to provide alternative
versions of fb_readl, fb_writel etc. that do byte-swapping.  That
would mean that all framebuffers would have to have the same
endianness, but that would suffice for embedded systems such as
Anton's and would end up a lot simpler IMHO.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to