On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:44:32 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for the framebuffers with non-native
> > > endianness. This is done via FBINFO_FOREIGN_ENDIAN flag that will
> > > be used by the drivers. Depending on the host endianness this flag
> > > will be overwritten by FBINFO_BE_MATH internal flag, or cleared.
> > >
> > > Tested to work on MPC8360E-RDK (BE) + Fujitsu MINT framebuffer (LE).
> >
> > That's a pretty large patch to fbdev core,
>
> Yes, but changes are mostly trivial. No insurance of typos and thinkos
> though. OTOH, it survived my tests.
>
> > and Tony appears to have gone
> > offline again and you didn't cc the fbdev mailing list.
>
> FRAMEBUFFER LAYER
> P: Antonino Daplas
> M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (subscribers-only)
>
> I'm lazy to subscribe on occasional patches. Yup, this is hardly
> an excuse...
While linux-fbdev is subscribers-only, non-subscribers are not plainly
rejected, but moderated, so the casual patch/comment/question comes
through.
I'll cook up a patch for MAINTAINERS to clarify.
> > Actually... should CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN exist, or should this feature
> > be permanently enabled?
>
> It should not. Because with CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN enabled, drawing
> might be a little bit slower, because of external checks for endianness
> (I didn't noticed any slowdown, but I guess it's still measurable if we
> find some fb benchmark).
> > I'd like to at least queue a patch in -mm so that CONFIG_FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN
> > is forced-on, so the code gets some runtime testing. Will that break
> > anything?
>
> Nope, it should not break anything, just possible fbconsole/tux drawing
> slowdown.
Tux drawing speed doesn't really matter, as it's done once only.
Console text drawing is different.
`time cat MAINTAINERS' is a good test. Of course, is most time is spent
in scrolling, you won't see much difference.
So probably we need a test file that contains lines of text interspersed
with `HOME' escape sequences, so we don't scroll?
> Thinking about it a little bit more, I believe we want to add a choice,
> which exactly foreign endianness we want to compile-in. Then, if we're
> pretty confident that particular BE machine uses only LE framebuffer,
> gcc can optimize away endianness checks.
>
> Patch on top of previous inlined here. With that patch, slowdown is
> possible with CONFIG_FB_BOTH_ENDIAN option only, which is still
> default if FOREIGN_ENDIAN is selected.
> With this patch FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN converted to menuconfig with the
> choice inside: which type of foreign endianness we want to compile-in.
>
The notion of `FOREIGN_ENDIAN' is relative, as it depends on the
architecture you're compiling for.
Suppose you have a PCI graphics card with a frame buffer that's always
big endian. When compiling for a big endian platform, the driver won't
depend on FB_FOREIGN_ENDIAN. When compiling for a little endian
platform, it will.
Shouldn't we add LITTLE_ENDIAN and BIG_ENDIAN Kconfig vars first, just
like we have 64BIT?
> As a bonus, now fb subsystem will refuse to register framebuffer with
> unsupported endianness, and will suggest a way to solve the problem.
I'd like to handle this in Kconfig (cfr. above).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
