On 10/17/07, Marian Balakowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> >> + memory {
> >> + device_type = "memory";
> >> + reg = <00000000 04000000>; // 64MB
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >
> > I think we're moving to the convetion of naming these nodes
> > "soc@<addr>" now. (You can drop the 5200 for the node name)
>
> Seems that this will not be painless, U-boot uses hardcoded
> paths with 'soc5200', so the appropriate patch will be needed.
> That may be ok for new boards but what do we do with lite5200,
> where U-boot upgrade is not always an option?
Hmm; yeah I guess there are probably already deployed tqm5200 boards
with hard coded soc5200. Alright; leave it as is.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(403) 399-0195
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
