Grant Likely wrote:
>> + memory {
>> + device_type = "memory";
>> + reg = <00000000 04000000>; // 64MB
>> + };
>> +
>> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>
> I think we're moving to the convetion of naming these nodes
> "soc@<addr>" now. (You can drop the 5200 for the node name)
Seems that this will not be painless, U-boot uses hardcoded
paths with 'soc5200', so the appropriate patch will be needed.
That may be ok for new boards but what do we do with lite5200,
where U-boot upgrade is not always an option?
m.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
