On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:30:57 +0400 Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote: > > >>>>on 40x to match the behavior 44x currently has. > > >>> Why bother doing this?! This will only warrant you imprecise > >>> decrementer > >>>interrupts while it should be interrupting at the precise period currently > >>>(if > >>>you load PIT once)... > > >> I.e. the error will only accumulate. NAK. > > > What error exactly? I'm not following you there. If there really is > > I was assuming that the decrementer is in auto-reload mode. Brain fade. > :-< Heh, ok. Glad I wasn't completely lost there :). josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
