Josh Boyer wrote: >>>>on 40x to match the behavior 44x currently has.
>>> Why bother doing this?! This will only warrant you imprecise decrementer >>>interrupts while it should be interrupting at the precise period currently >>>(if >>>you load PIT once)... >> I.e. the error will only accumulate. NAK. > What error exactly? I'm not following you there. If there really is I was assuming that the decrementer is in auto-reload mode. Brain fade. :-< > josh WBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
