On Wed, Nov 21 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So you say "keep the patch as it with this module-parameter
> compatibility"?

I'm saying that in my opinion external behaviour of the gadgets should
not change until a configfs solution is ready and final.

As for the patch, I had some concerns about addition of the flat list of
arguments as this looked to me as a quick hack which will be removed
once configfs is ready any way.

Just my 0.02 CHF.

-- 
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

Attachment: pgpkaUSiIL0qa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to