Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> writes: > On 05/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Eric W. Biederman (11): >> signal: Rename send_signal send_signal_locked >> signal: Replace __group_send_sig_info with send_signal_locked >> ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP >> ptrace/xtensa: Replace PT_SINGLESTEP with TIF_SINGLESTEP >> ptrace: Remove arch_ptrace_attach >> signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked >> ptrace: Reimplement PTRACE_KILL by always sending SIGKILL >> ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail >> ptrace: Admit ptrace_stop can generate spuriuos SIGTRAPs >> ptrace: Don't change __state >> ptrace: Always take siglock in ptrace_resume >> >> Peter Zijlstra (1): >> sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state > > OK, lgtm. > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > > > I still dislike you removed TASK_WAKEKILL from TASK_TRACED, but I can't > find a good argument against it ;) and yes, this is subjective.
Does anyone else have any comments on this patchset? If not I am going to apply this to a branch and get it into linux-next. Eric _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
