Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> writes: > On 05/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> --- a/include/linux/sched.h >> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h >> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct task_group; >> /* Convenience macros for the sake of set_current_state: */ >> #define TASK_KILLABLE (TASK_WAKEKILL | >> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) >> #define TASK_STOPPED (TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_STOPPED) >> -#define TASK_TRACED (TASK_WAKEKILL | __TASK_TRACED) >> +#define TASK_TRACED __TASK_TRACED > > however I personally still dislike this change. But let me read the > code with this series applied, perhaps I will change my mind. If not, > I will argue ;)
That is fair. I kind of grew on my after I implemented it and wrapped my head around what was going on, as it is simple and there are no implicit cases. Eric _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
