"Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com> writes: > Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 05/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> >>> Eric W. Biederman (11): >>> signal: Rename send_signal send_signal_locked >>> signal: Replace __group_send_sig_info with send_signal_locked >>> ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP >>> ptrace/xtensa: Replace PT_SINGLESTEP with TIF_SINGLESTEP >>> ptrace: Remove arch_ptrace_attach >>> signal: Use lockdep_assert_held instead of assert_spin_locked >>> ptrace: Reimplement PTRACE_KILL by always sending SIGKILL >>> ptrace: Document that wait_task_inactive can't fail >>> ptrace: Admit ptrace_stop can generate spuriuos SIGTRAPs >>> ptrace: Don't change __state >>> ptrace: Always take siglock in ptrace_resume >>> >>> Peter Zijlstra (1): >>> sched,signal,ptrace: Rework TASK_TRACED, TASK_STOPPED state >> >> OK, lgtm. >> >> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> >> >> >> I still dislike you removed TASK_WAKEKILL from TASK_TRACED, but I can't >> find a good argument against it ;) and yes, this is subjective. > > Does anyone else have any comments on this patchset? > > If not I am going to apply this to a branch and get it into linux-next.
Thank you all. I have pushed this to my ptrace_stop-cleanup-for-v5.19 branch and placed the branch in linux-next. Eric _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
