On 8/27/26 13:18, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: >> So actually you're increasing by a cacheline and increasing the VMA size by >> 64 bytes, i.e. 1/3, which is unacceptable obviously. >> >> Maybe there's something that can be done with: >> >> /* forced alignments: 1 */ >> >> Perhaps? But that looks potentially ugly. >> > > I say elsewhere (or think I do) but to highlight - I think probably we could > fix > this by putting the flags in the low bits of vm_uffd_state.ctx?
if that's possible that would be clearly preferable memory-wise. -- Cheers, David
