On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > So actually you're increasing by a cacheline and increasing the VMA size by > 64 bytes, i.e. 1/3, which is unacceptable obviously. > > Maybe there's something that can be done with: > > /* forced alignments: 1 */ > > Perhaps? But that looks potentially ugly. >
I say elsewhere (or think I do) but to highlight - I think probably we could fix this by putting the flags in the low bits of vm_uffd_state.ctx? -- Cheers, Lorenzo
