On 6 October 2015 at 10:09, Russell King - ARM Linux
<li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:02:10PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> +static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu, ret;
>> +
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (!dev)
>> + return -1;
>
> NAK. Go figure out why, I'm too lazy to tell you.
I will correct the return code to be -ENODEV.
Was that the reasoning behind the NAK?
>
>> +
>> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
