Hi Suzuki, [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
wget
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=arm64
Note: the linux-review/Suzuki-K-Poulose/arm64-Consolidate-CPU-feature-handling
HEAD bfdef3a10032e84cc7ae186a058443219f110679 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectibility.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c: In function 'cpu_enable_features':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:733:52: error: 'const struct
>> arm64_cpu_capabilities' has no member named 'sys_reg'
if(!cpus_have_cap(caps[i].capability) || !caps[i].sys_reg)
^
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:739:47: error: 'const struct
arm64_cpu_capabilities' has no member named 'sys_reg'
if (!feature_matches(read_cpu_sysreg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i]))
^
vim +733 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
727 const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = arm64_features;
728
729 for(i = 0; caps[i].desc; i++)
730 if (caps[i].enable && cpus_have_cap(caps[i].capability))
731 caps[i].enable(NULL);
732 for(i = 0; caps[i].desc; i++) {
> 733 if(!cpus_have_cap(caps[i].capability) ||
> !caps[i].sys_reg)
734 continue;
735 /*
736 * If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we
cannot proceed
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
