Driver is guaranteed to be present on a call to cpufreq_parse_governor()
and there is no need to check for !cpufreq_driver. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index a80bd68bbd74..a05cc75cc45d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -520,9 +520,6 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *str_governor,
unsigned int *policy,
{
int err = -EINVAL;
- if (!cpufreq_driver)
- goto out;
-
if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
if (!strncasecmp(str_governor, "performance",
CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN)) {
*policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
@@ -557,7 +554,6 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *str_governor,
unsigned int *policy,
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
}
-out:
return err;
}
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
