Its all about caching min/max freq requested by userspace, and
the name 'cpufreq_real_policy' doesn't fit that well. Rename it to
cpufreq_user_policy.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 54dbbff0a55e..6ff6a4d95eea 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
        unsigned int            transition_latency;
 };
 
-struct cpufreq_real_policy {
+struct cpufreq_user_policy {
        unsigned int            min;    /* in kHz */
        unsigned int            max;    /* in kHz */
 };
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
        struct work_struct      update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
                                         * called, but you're in IRQ context */
 
-       struct cpufreq_real_policy      user_policy;
+       struct cpufreq_user_policy user_policy;
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table  *freq_table;
 
        struct list_head        policy_list;
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to