Hi Fabio,
On 27/06/15 21:17, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Philippe,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Fabio Estevam<feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, please submit a formal patch.
I thought it was imx1_timer_init_dt because in imx27.dtsi we have:
compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
So I am wondering if this is correct or it should be
compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt"; instead?
In addition to the drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c patch, could
you also try the change below?
Yes, I do it
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27.dtsi
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
};
gpt1: timer@10003000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x10003000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<26>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT1_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
};
gpt2: timer@10004000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x10004000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<25>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT2_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
};
gpt3: timer@10005000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x10005000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<24>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT3_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@
};
gpt4: timer@10019000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x10019000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<4>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT4_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
};
gpt5: timer@1001a000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x1001a000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<3>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT5_IPG_GATE>,
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
};
gpt6: timer@1001f000 {
- compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt";
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt";
reg =<0x1001f000 0x1000>;
interrupts =<2>;
clocks =<&clks IMX27_CLK_GPT6_IPG_GATE>,
I've tested this change, and it works fine.
In the file drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c, there is :
#define imx21_gpt_irq_disable imx1_gpt_irq_disable
#define imx21_gpt_irq_enable imx1_gpt_irq_enable
So I think that using imx1 or imx21 has the same result;
Do you think I should put both change in on patch ?
Or is it better to do two patches please ?
Regards,
Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
