On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Philippe Reynes <trem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've looked the code in drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c, in the > definition > of imx_gpt_type, there is : > GPT_TYPE_IMX21, /* i.MX21/27 */ > > So I've done a little change in your patch, I've used imx21_timer_init_dt > for > imx27 : > > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-imx-gpt.c > @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ static void __init imx6dl_timer_init_dt(struct > device_node *np) > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx1_timer, "fsl,imx1-gpt", imx1_timer_init_dt); > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx21_timer, "fsl,imx21-gpt", imx21_timer_init_dt); > +CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx27_timer, "fsl,imx27-gpt", imx21_timer_init_dt); > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx31_timer, "fsl,imx31-gpt", imx31_timer_init_dt); > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx25_timer, "fsl,imx25-gpt", imx31_timer_init_dt); > CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(imx50_timer, "fsl,imx50-gpt", imx31_timer_init_dt); > > I've tested it, and it works fine, now my apf27 (imx27) boot without any > issue. > So good catch, thanks a lot for this patch. Excellent :-) > > I may send a patch on lkml if you want. Yes, please submit a formal patch. I thought it was imx1_timer_init_dt because in imx27.dtsi we have: compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx1-gpt"; So I am wondering if this is correct or it should be compatible = "fsl,imx27-gpt", "fsl,imx21-gpt"; instead? Regards, Fabio Estevam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
