> This is not a valid patch submission. Please see > Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
I resent the patch an hour ago based on that document, thanks for pointing this out. I need to know if the patch is in good shape now, thanks > > Anyway, why do you think your patch makes strlen() better? > Now strlen() increments a variable for each character it faces, hence > it will consume more cycles. you can look at the output of objdump -d to see why, also the assembly snippet send by another person make this clear. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
