On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Orestes Leal Rodriguez <lukes...@gmail.com> wrote: > very small update to strlen and strnlen that now use less cpu instructions > by using a counter to avoid the memory addresses substraction to find the > length of the string.
This is not a valid patch submission. Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Anyway, why do you think your patch makes strlen() better? Now strlen() increments a variable for each character it faces, hence it will consume more cycles. -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
