On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:11:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - MWAITX takes a 'timeout' parameter, but otherwise behaves exactly
> like MWAIT: i.e. once idle it won't exit idle on its own
Let me quote the commit message:
"MWAITT, another name is MWAITX (MWAIT with extensions), has a
configurable timer that causes MWAITX to exit on expiration."
You need to set the second bit in ECX to enable the timer.
I guess if you don't, then you get normal MWAIT but then you don't need
the timeout either...
> - based on the 'timeout' hint, MWAITX can internally optimize how
> deep sleep it enters. If the timeout is large it goes deep, if
> it's small, it goes shallow.
I haven't heard anything about handling the timeout this way and if it
is not done this way, maybe Rui could forward this idea to hw people...
> If it's a true timeout, as you suggest, then I don't see any obvious
> way to support it, especially if it does not give access to deeper
> sleep states.
Right.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
