On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
> >
> > Does that include nmi? I'm a bit afraid of touching that code.
>
> NMI is kind of special, since it's really not supposed to touch
> 'current' or anything like that, and that's how we do preempt-count
> (and that's where irq-count is) right now.
>
> I would prefer to have preempt_count be a percpu variable rather than
> a per-thread one, but there are historical reasons for that horror. Oh
> well.
preempt_count is a per cpu variable at least on x86 since:
commit c2daa3bed53a 'sched, x86: Provide a per-cpu preempt_count
implementation'
> > It's certainly easy enough to bump irq_count in the paranoid entries.
>
> It definitely shouldn't be done from the assembly code. Usually it's
> "irq_enter/exit()" that does it, but for NMI you'd presumably just do
> it explicitly from do_nmi() or similar. But NMI really is nastier than
> other cases, see above.
do_nmi()
nmi_enter()
preempt_count_add(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
> (That said, I thought we did it anyway, but now that I look I can't
> find it. So I was probably just smoking something)
Certainly something you should not smoke again :)
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
