On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On x86, sleeping while on an IST or irq stack has a surprisingly
> good chance of working, but it can also fail dramatically. Add an
> arch hook to allow schedule and __might_sleep to catch sleeping on
> the wrong stack.
Why doesn't the normal in_interrupt() test catch this?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
