On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:45:47PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> OK, but the API name is a bit confusing, and that is easy to cause
>> misuse, like in nvme.
>>
>> Also requeue one request in completion handler may be a
>> common case, so maybe it is better to let blk_mq_requeue_request()
>> handle both adding to request list and kicking off, and introduce
>> blk_mq_prep_requeue_req()(or better name) to batch operations.
>
> For now please just add some documentation.  I'm happy to revisit
> these once we have a few user in tree, but for now I'd like to keep
> blk-mq a little more stable to not impact the merges of the major
> users.

There are two users: one is nvme, another is scsi-mq, and both
don't need batch operations now.


Thanks,
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to