On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:16:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 13:12 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:03:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 08:35 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Paul Walmsley also noted the need for patch
> > > > submitters to know who the key reviewers are and suggested adding an
> > > > "R:" tag to the MAINTAINERS file to record this information on a
> > > > per-subsystem basis.
> > > []
> > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > []
> > > > @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> > > >  
> > > >         P: Person (obsolete)
> > > >         M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain>
> > > > +       R: Designated reviewer, who should be CCed on patches,
> > > > +          format: FullName <address@domain>
> > > >         L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area
> > > >         W: Web-page with status/info
> > > >         Q: Patchwork web based patch tracking system site
> > > 
> > > Perhaps the M: and R: roles should be more fully
> > > described here.
> > > 
> > > The R: entry description doesn't need commas.
> > > 
> > > Maybe something like:
> > >   M: Maintainer (to:) FullName <address@domain>
> > >   R: Reviewer   (cc:) FullName <address@domain>
> > 
> > This is arguably better organized, but I need to keep my focus on adding
> > the designated reviewer.  I am not in a position to undertake a rewrite
> > of the MAINTAINER file preamble at this point.
> 
> That's silly, you're adding the "R" entry.
> Add a proper description for it.

I will take another look at R: in a few days and possibly wordsmith it.

> > > You might as well send the get_maintainer update with this
> > > series too.
> > 
> > Interesting...  Who is the maintainer for get_maintainer?  ;-)
> 
> Some numbskull just signed up for that.
> 
> He suggests you keep all the patches that add
> support for this "R: reviewer" feature together.

My reluctance is due to the fact that this will change how newbies
submit patches.  But if we get a few Acked-by or Reviewed-by responses
from high-level maintainers (Linus, Greg, Ingo, Thomas, Peter, Ted,
Dave, Ben, ...), I will of course be happy to queue it.

                                                        Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to