On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 08:35 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Paul Walmsley also noted the need for patch
> submitters to know who the key reviewers are and suggested adding an
> "R:" tag to the MAINTAINERS file to record this information on a
> per-subsystem basis.
[]
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
[]
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
>
> P: Person (obsolete)
> M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@domain>
> + R: Designated reviewer, who should be CCed on patches,
> + format: FullName <address@domain>
> L: Mailing list that is relevant to this area
> W: Web-page with status/info
> Q: Patchwork web based patch tracking system site
Perhaps the M: and R: roles should be more fully
described here.
The R: entry description doesn't need commas.
Maybe something like:
M: Maintainer (to:) FullName <address@domain>
R: Reviewer (cc:) FullName <address@domain>
You might as well send the get_maintainer update with this
series too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
