On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:55:11 -0700 >> > Alexei Starovoitov <a...@plumgrid.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Tracing filters are parsing user supplied character string and >> >> constructing >> >> a predicate tree. filter_match_preds() was used to walk nodes of the tree >> >> to >> >> simulate matching of boolean expression. >> >> >> > >> > I applied this on top of net-next, from: >> > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git >> > (master branch) >> > >> > and got this compile error: >> >> Sorry I wasn't clear in the log. >> This patch depends on JIT patches that were posted separately. >> Since this one is RFC, I didn't want to mix them. >> JIT patches: >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/348558/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/348559/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/348560/ > > Might make sense for you to get a korg account and stick such bits > into Git trees, to ease testing.
it would be an honor. Thank you. What is the next step for this particular patch? Sounds like dependency on full net is a showstopper. I think splitting bpf into small component will clean up dependency for seccomp as well. bpf can move into net/bpf/ dir and go via net-next tree. If Dave is ok with this, I can start hacking. It looks to be more or less straight forward. There are few ways to split it. The only contentious piece is skb_copy_bits(). I think we can come up with something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
