On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:41:16 -0800 ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: > > > From: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:30:04 -0800 > > > >> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:50:19 -0800 ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. > >> Biederman) wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Modify audit_send_reply to directly use a non-blocking send and > >>> to return an error on failure (if anyone cares). > >>> > >>> Modify audit_list_rules_send to use audit_send_reply and give up > >>> if we can not send a packet. > >>> > >>> Merge audit_list_rules into iaudit_list_rules_send as the code > >>> is now sufficiently simple to not justify to callers. > >>> > >>> Kill audit_send_list, audit_send_reply_thread because using > >>> a separate thread for replies is not needed when sending > >>> packets syncrhonously. > >> > >> Nothing much seems to be happening here? > > Well you picked up the patch that fixes the worst of the bugs that I was > complaining about. Beyond that I don't know what makes sense. Oh, so I did. I wasn't planning on merging it myself, hoping that someone who hasaclue will step in. Help. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
