On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 20:50:19 -0800 ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> > Modify audit_send_reply to directly use a non-blocking send and > to return an error on failure (if anyone cares). > > Modify audit_list_rules_send to use audit_send_reply and give up > if we can not send a packet. > > Merge audit_list_rules into iaudit_list_rules_send as the code > is now sufficiently simple to not justify to callers. > > Kill audit_send_list, audit_send_reply_thread because using > a separate thread for replies is not needed when sending > packets syncrhonously. Nothing much seems to be happening here? In an earlier email you said "While reading through 3.14-rc1 I found a pretty siginficant mishandling of network namespaces in the recent audit changes." Were those recent audit changes a post-3.14 thing? And what is the user-visible effect of the mishandling? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
