On Thursday, February 06, 2014 03:41:23 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
> initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
> below:
> 
>       get_online_cpus();
> 
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>               init_cpu(cpu);
> 
>       register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
> 
>       put_online_cpus();
> 
> This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
> cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
> with CPU hotplug operations).
> 
> Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
> registration is:
> 
>       cpu_maps_update_begin();
> 
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>               init_cpu(cpu);
> 
>       /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
>       __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
> 
>       cpu_maps_update_done();
> 
> 
> Fix the intel-idle code by using this latter form of callback registration.
> 
> Cc: Len Brown <l...@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This looks good to me.  Len, what do you think?

Srivatsa, how does it depend on the rest of your series?

> ---
> 
>  drivers/idle/intel_idle.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> index 8e1939f..716ee5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> @@ -681,14 +681,19 @@ static int __init intel_idle_init(void)
>       if (intel_idle_cpuidle_devices == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +     cpu_maps_update_begin();
> +
>       for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>               retval = intel_idle_cpu_init(i);
>               if (retval) {
> +                     cpu_maps_update_done();
>                       cpuidle_unregister_driver(&intel_idle_driver);
>                       return retval;
>               }
>       }
> -     register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> +     __register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> +
> +     cpu_maps_update_done();
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -698,10 +703,13 @@ static void __exit intel_idle_exit(void)
>       intel_idle_cpuidle_devices_uninit();
>       cpuidle_unregister_driver(&intel_idle_driver);
>  
> +     cpu_maps_update_begin();
>  
>       if (lapic_timer_reliable_states != LAPIC_TIMER_ALWAYS_RELIABLE)
>               on_each_cpu(__setup_broadcast_timer, (void *)false, 1);
> -     unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> +     __unregister_cpu_notifier(&cpu_hotplug_notifier);
> +
> +     cpu_maps_update_done();
>  
>       return;
>  }
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to