On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:42:58 +0530
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
> initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
> below:
> 
>       get_online_cpus();
> 
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>               init_cpu(cpu);
> 
>       register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
> 
>       put_online_cpus();
> 
> This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
> cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
> with CPU hotplug operations).
> 
> Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
> registration is:
> 
>       cpu_maps_update_begin();
> 
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>               init_cpu(cpu);
> 
>       /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
>       __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
> 
>       cpu_maps_update_done();
> 
> 
> Fix the tracing ring-buffer code by using this latter form of callback
> registration.
> 
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to