On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:01:08AM -0800, j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 07:34:51AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:09:53PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > > > Add the prototype declaration of function memory_block_size_bytes() in > > > memory.c. > > > > > > This eliminates the following warning in memory.c: > > > drivers/base/memory.c:87:1: warning: no previous prototype for > > > ‘memory_block_size_bytes’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.khe...@gmail.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org> > > > --- > > > drivers/base/memory.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c > > > index bece691..cfa03de 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/base/memory.c > > > +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c > > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static void memory_block_release(struct device *dev) > > > kfree(mem); > > > } > > > > > > +unsigned long __weak memory_block_size_bytes(void); > > > unsigned long __weak memory_block_size_bytes(void) > > > > If this patch is the "solution" then something else is really wrong > > here, please use your judgement to realize this... > > It's a weak symbol provided and consumed within the same file, and then > overridden on a few random architectures. It isn't currently prototyped > in any header file. The other potential solution would be to add it to > an appropriate existing header or create a new one. Any suggestions for > an appropriate existing header to prototype it in instead?
device.h? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
