On Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:20 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 07:36, Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Use devm_regulator_register() to make cleanup paths simpler.
> > @@ -349,8 +350,6 @@ static int gpio_regulator_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > {
> > struct gpio_regulator_data *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > - regulator_unregister(drvdata->dev);
> > -
> > gpio_free_array(drvdata->gpios, drvdata->nr_gpios);
> >
> > kfree(drvdata->states);
>
> In most of the cases where unregister doesn't happen to be the only or
> last call in the remove path,
> I am not sure if change in ordering wouldn't cause any functional
> issues. For. e.g., in this patch we are freeing the gpios and the
> driver states even before unregistering the device which is logically
> not right.
>
OK, I see.
I agree with your suggestion in order to keep the code stable.
I will remove this patch from next v3 patch series.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
