On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 03:20:20PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > ftp://ftp.ocs.com.au/pub/kernel.stack.gz. ix86 specific, probably gcc > specific and it only picks up code that you compile. The Stanford > checker is much better. I have no complete understanding of the stanford checker, but I was assuming that it was a hacked version of gcc. If yes it has to use the preprocessor and also will only catch stuff you compile. I don't see how you can do meaningfull lint like checks without a preprocessor ;) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 and ... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... David Welch
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack var... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Dawson Engler
- RE: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Dunlap, Randy
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Andreas Dilger