On Sat, 26 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2001 08:31:24 -0700 (PDT), > dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >another possibility for a debugging mode for the kernel would be to hack > >gcc to emit something like the following in the prologue of every function > >(after the frame is allocated): > > IKD already does that, via the CONFIG_DEBUG_KSTACK, CONFIG_KSTACK_METER > and CONFIG_KSTACK_THRESHOLD options. No need to hack gcc. oh nice! you hook in through gcc -pg mcount stuff. -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 and ... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... David Welch
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack var... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Dawson Engler
- RE: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Dunlap, Randy
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Andreas Dilger