On Fri, 25 May 2001 08:11:07 +0100, David Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Why not use a task gate for the double fault handler points to a >per-processor TSS with a seperate stack. This would allow limited recovery >from a kernel stack overlay. It is far too late by then. struct task is at the bottom of the kernel stack, a stack overflow would corrupt the task data long before the hardware was involved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2.4.4 and ... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Anton Altaparmakov
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... David Welch
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Keith Owens
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack var... dean gaudet
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (&... Andi Kleen
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variabl... Brian Gerst
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) in 2... Dawson Engler
- Re: [CHECKER] large stack variables (>=1K) ... Alexander Viro