[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Having now briefly looked at the language constructs first-hand, I > can see two ways to go about this: > 1) Have a HACKER symbol which unsuppresses the "unusual" options, and > suppresses the "generalised" ones > 2) Have a HACKERS submenu system which contains all the derivations > that could *possibly* be un-defaulted, and allow our intrepid hacker > to explicitly force each to a value or leave unset. I prefer the former, which is how it's already implemented in CML1. But the discussion of this is entirely unrelated to the discussion of CML2, and changes along these lines must not be forced into the kernel with the CML2 patch. If ESR is going to sneak policy changes into the kernel with the CML2 mechanism patch, I'm sure we all have patches we'd like him to add to it too, because we don't want to have to justify them on their own. :) -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Woodhouse
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Eric S. Raymond
- Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up David Woodhouse
- Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jes Sorensen
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Helge Hafting
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Alan Cox
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... M.
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond