On 20 May 2001, Robert M. Love wrote: > I feel that there should *never ever* be a legit situation that the > configuration tool does not allow. Not ever. Two reasons: > > First, I tend to trust the config tools (perhaps too much). If they > tell me x implies y, or x implies not y, I will believe it. I won't > think "hm, the code must be wrong, let me hand edit the config" (which > is something I don't want to have to do, anyhow). Then just don't go as far as using it in "Expert (might be unsafe)" mode. If you blindly trust the tool that much the intermediate mode might be what you need. Nicolas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jes Sorensen
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Helge Hafting
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Alan Cox
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... M.
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... David Woodhouse
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... John Stoffel
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Keith Owens
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosop... Keith Owens